Filter by Emotion
happy, smilecool, awesomefunny, amusedanger, ragebizarre, weirdwow, shockedroll eyessad, fear

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday let stand a 200-year prison term for an Arizona man convicted of possessing 20 child pornography images, turning down his appeal arguing the sentence was excessive or cruel and unusual punishment.

link: (http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNew...)
submitted by: garymays   Feb 26, 2007
category: News keywords: supreme, court
Discuss It!
avatar
Serves him right, he shouldn't be looking at child pornography.
posted by: Jen1time     Feb 27, 2007
avatar
That is one tough sentence. I think they hand out lighter sentences for rape. (Not that I would know or anything)
posted by: ambiguous81     Feb 27, 2007
avatar
I do think he should be punished, but that is cruel and unusual punishment.
posted by: Escobar     Feb 27, 2007
avatar
I think he deserves to rot in jail. Children should not be show in a porograhic manner. It is deplorable!
posted by: suzieqt     Apr 14, 2007
avatar
CHILDREN UNDER 10 HAVING SEX AND HE'S DOWNLOADING PICTURES OF IT?????? I rest my case.
posted by: falynne     May 21, 2007

Please login or register to leave a comment.



About | Privacy Policy | Bug, Question, Comment? | RSS Feed RSS
©2008 VOTEmotion.com All Rights Reserved.
Jack Conway